JuniorHockey.io

MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE THE USHL’S FINAL RECKONING

The USHL postseason is down to its last two teams, and the matchup feels right for this stage of the year. The defending champion Muskegon Lumberjacks are back in the Clark Cup Final, and this time they get the league’s top Western seed in the Sioux Falls Stampede. The series is best-of-five in a 2-2-1 format, with Games 1, 2, and 5 in Sioux Falls because the Stampede had the better record in the regular season. Game 1 is set for Friday, May 15, Game 2 for Saturday, May 16, and the series then shifts to Muskegon for Game 3 on May 22.
There is also real history here. Muskegon won its first Clark Cup in franchise history last spring, beating Waterloo in five games and turning a long chase into a championship. Sioux Falls has the deeper Clark Cup résumé, with league titles in 2006-07, 2014-15, and 2018-19. That 2014-15 run matters here because Sioux Falls swept Muskegon in the Clark Cup Final. The last time these two programs met on this stage, it was not close. This is more than champion versus challenger. It is the reigning champion against a program with recent title history and prior success in this exact final pairing.
Muskegon’s route back to this round says a lot about what kind of team it is. The Lumberjacks came into the playoffs as the No. 5 seed in the East and did not get an easy path. They swept Cedar Rapids in the first round, then won a Game 5 against Dubuque in the conference semifinal, then won another Game 5 against Madison in the conference final. That is a long road, and Muskegon has not looked worn down by it. Twelve playoff games in, with two Game 5s already behind them, the Lumberjacks have had to respond when things got ugly.
Site sponsors:
Muskegon is not a team that falls apart when the game turns on it. In the Dubuque series, the Lumberjacks fell behind 2-1, answered with a 4-2 Game 4 win, then crushed the Fighting Saints 6-1 in Game 5 after giving up the first goal. In the Madison series, they fell behind 2-0 in the deciding game, then ripped off six unanswered goals to win 6-2 and punch their ticket back to the final. In that clincher, Muskegon went 4-for-6 on the power play and got two goals from Rudolfs Berzkalns. This team does not sit back and wait for something good to happen. Once Muskegon starts bearing down, games can flip fast.
Drew Stewart has delivered big goals throughout the run. Viktor Norringer and Adam Belusko have both been major pieces of the offense. Berzkalns was huge in the Madison clincher. Jack Christ and Carter Amico have also given the team meaningful punch during the postseason. In goal, Carl Axelsson’s numbers will not jump off the page, but he has settled games when Muskegon needed him to and held the line long enough for the offense to take over.
Sioux Falls got here differently. Sioux Falls did not have to fight uphill from Game 1. They earned a first-round bye the old-fashioned way, over 62 regular-season games. Sioux Falls finished 43-16-3-0, ranked second in the league in goals per game at 4.31, ranked third in goals against per game at 2.79, and ran a 25 percent power play. Ryan Cruthers was recognized as a Coach of the Year finalist, and the numbers behind that nomination show why. Sioux Falls was not just good in one area. Their numbers held up offensively, defensively, and on special teams.
The Stampede’s playoff route has tested that completeness. After the first-round bye, Sioux Falls beat Lincoln in four games to reach the Western final, then had to go the distance with Fargo. That Western Conference Final got nasty. Sioux Falls lost Game 3 in triple overtime, stayed alive with a 2-1 overtime win in Game 4, and then finished the job with a 3-2 Game 5 win on home ice. Logan Renkowski scored twice in that clincher, and Joey Macrina buried the winner late in the third. That kind of series either breaks a team or toughens it. Sioux Falls came out the other side looking like the latter.
The top-end talent on Sioux Falls gives the Stampede a different feel from Muskegon. Renkowski scored 43 goals in the regular season, the second-highest total in the league, and then walked into Game 5 against Fargo and scored twice with the season on the line. Thomas Zocco finished the regular season with 70 points. Brent Solomon put up 53 points, earned All-USHL Third Team honors, and was especially dangerous on the power play. Cooper Soller won Rookie of the Year after a 26-goal, 49-point season. Jake Prunty made the All-Rookie First Team from the blue line. In goal, Linards Feldbergs led the league with 35 wins during the regular season and posted a 2.51 goals-against average with a .910 save percentage. Sioux Falls is not hiding anything. They can score, they can stop the puck, and they can punish you on special teams.
That tension is what makes this final worth watching. These are not opposites. Both teams push pace, both want the puck, and both can make you pay in a hurry. This is not a defense-versus-offense series. Muskegon tends to win by leaning on teams, wearing down goalies, and creating havoc around the net. Sioux Falls tends to win by combining pace with cleaner top-end finishing and a steadier full-season defensive profile. The clubs also split their two-game January set in Sioux Falls, with the Stampede taking the first meeting and Muskegon responding in the second. That does not predict anything by itself, but it does reinforce that neither side is skating into this blind.
Start with the goaltending. That is where this series could turn. Feldbergs has the stronger season-long body of work and the stronger résumé as the final opens. He has already been through a brutal Western bracket, and Sioux Falls knows what it is getting from him. Axelsson gets there a different way. He has been asked to absorb a heavier playoff workload because Muskegon has had the harder road, and he has made the saves that mattered and gotten the defending champs back to this stage. If Muskegon steals one of the first two games in Sioux Falls, Axelsson will probably be the biggest reason why. If Sioux Falls takes early control, it will likely mean Feldbergs held the line while the Stampede’s offense started landing clean punches.
Special teams may decide more of this final than either side wants to admit. Sioux Falls carried a 25 percent power play through the regular season and has enough finishers to make one bad penalty feel expensive. Muskegon, though, comes in hot in that area. The Lumberjacks scored a shorthanded goal in their Game 4 win over Dubuque, then went 4-for-6 on the power play in the Game 5 clincher against Madison. That does not mean Muskegon holds the edge, but neither bench can assume the power-play battle will sort itself out in their favor. The first team that gives the other a power play with room to operate could be giving away a game right there.